24
Found a stat about false alarms that really threw me
I was reading a report from the National Fire Protection Association last week, and it said something like 98% of all automatic fire alarm signals are false alarms. That's a crazy high number. I've been installing systems for about eight years now, and I always knew false alarms were common, but I figured maybe half or so. It makes you think about all the time and money spent responding to these calls. I had a job at a school in Springfield last month where we had to redo a whole zone because of a faulty duct detector causing weekly calls. The fire chief there told me they get more annoyed by our false alarms than anything else. So the debate is, should we be pushing for way stricter rules on alarm design and installs to cut this down, even if it costs more? Or is this just the cost of doing business and keeping people safe? What's your take on that number?
2 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In2 Comments
willow67215d ago
Honestly, that number sounds about right to me, and maybe it's not even a bad thing. Think about it, a system that goes off for burnt toast is still a system that's working and checking for problems. Stricter rules just mean more expensive installs and upgrades that clients will fight against. If we chase perfection, we risk making things so complicated and pricey that people skip maintenance or even the system itself. Sometimes a few false alarms are just the price of having a safety net that's always listening.
6
sethb4515d ago
Wait, did you just call burnt toast a system check? That's wild. My old apartment alarm went off if you looked at the toaster wrong and it was a nightmare, not a feature. Calling that "working" feels like calling a car alarm that screams when a leaf falls on it "extra safe". There's a huge gap between chasing perfection and accepting a system that cries wolf over breakfast.
2