Can we talk about the guy who got dragged for a 2013 tweet versus the guy who actually scammed people in 2022?
I keep seeing folks mash two totally different cases together: the guy who lost his job over an old joke he posted at 19 on a now-dead account, and the Nashville landlord who got called out after 6 tenants posted receipts of him keeping their deposits. One is a paper trail of actual harm, the other is a screenshot with no victim anywhere in it. I think we lump them because the pile-on looks the same from the outside, but only one of them has a person on the other end who lost real money. So where do you draw the line, is it the harm done or just how bad the posts look?