9
A guy at a diner in Boise totally changed how I argue about moon landing stuff
He told me my main point was weak because I kept using the same old blurry photo evidence. I switched to focusing on the technical timeline of the radio transmissions instead. What's one piece of evidence you think gets overused in these debates?
3 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In3 Comments
finley4471mo agoMost Upvoted
Honestly the flag waving thing is so tired. People see that and think it's some huge gotcha, but there's a simple explanation for it in a vacuum. That footage gets passed around constantly even though it's been debunked a million times. It just makes the person bringing it up look like they only watched a five minute YouTube clip.
8
ward.emery1mo ago
You said it's been debunked a million times, but that's the thing, it hasn't really. The "simple explanation" people give is just one theory and it has its own problems. The footage is weird, and saying it's tired doesn't make the questions go away. It's okay if some folks still find it strange without having all the answers.
9
piper_thompson311d ago
The flag waving thing has been debunked for like 15 years.
8