Loading…
13
I finally timed how long a manual extraction takes versus using a lancet
I was skeptical about lancets for a long time, but after timing myself on a client with stubborn blackheads, the lancet method was 15 minutes faster and way less red. It just felt more precise and controlled. Has anyone else switched tools and been shocked by the time difference?
3 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In3 Comments
victorross5mo ago
Yeah, the "way less red" part is what sold me too. I used to think lancets were overkill, but the healing time after is just so much better. It feels cleaner and you don't have to press as hard.
4
gray_patel5mo ago
Interesting how experiences can differ, @victorross. I've actually found the opposite to be true for me. The redness and healing time seemed about the same whether I used a lancet or a regular needle. The extra step just felt like more hassle for no real gain. It might come down to skin type or technique, but I never noticed that cleaner feel you mentioned. For my routine, the simpler method works just fine.
2
taylorb943mo ago
Has anyone ever tried both methods side by side on different arms just to see if there's an actual difference or if it's all in our heads? I swear half the battle with this stuff is just placebo effect. You think it's cleaner so you pay more attention to the spot, then boom, it heals faster. Meanwhile I'm over here using the same dull sewing needle I've had for three years and wondering why I still get lumps. Maybe the lancet people are onto something, or maybe they just have better lighting in their bathrooms.
2